Skip to content
Story Recruitment
For founders and CFOs

Restructuring, and what it means for the finance seat

Restructuring covers three different moves under one word: an operational cost-out (headcount and spend), a financial restructure (renegotiating debt or equity terms), and formal insolvency restructuring (administration, a Part 5.3A deed, liquidation), which is a licensed practitioner’s job, not a recruiter’s. Most founders searching this mean the first two.

By Last updated 6 min read

A cost-out and a financial restructure are finance-led calls about runway, headcount and terms, not a legal insolvency process. What I see from the hiring side: this activity is pushing more senior finance leaders back into the market for longer, which changes who is actually available to hire right now.

Cost-out, financial restructure, or formal insolvency

An operational cost-out is a business resetting its spend, usually headcount, against a revised runway target, run internally by the finance function. A financial restructure goes a layer further: renegotiating debt covenants, a convertible note’s maturity, or an investor’s terms, still without any formal insolvency step. Formal restructuring, an administration or a Part 5.3A deed of company arrangement, is a different thing entirely: a licensed registered liquidator runs it under the Corporations Act, and it sits outside anything a recruiter advises on. If that is where a business is, the right first call is a registered practitioner, not a finance hire.

What it does to the senior finance hiring market

What I am seeing from the hiring side of this: businesses cutting costs are frequently replacing a senior leader with a mid-level or lower hire, which means genuinely senior finance leaders are staying in the candidate market for longer than they used to.[1] For a founder hiring into that market, it is practical good news: the calibre of candidate available at the first-CFO level is higher right now than the roles on offer would normally attract.

Cost-out without a finance lead owning it, versus cost-out with one
Cut first, model laterModel first, then cut
Headcount decisionsWhy I don't recommend itMade against a target, not a rebuilt runway model.Why I recommend itTested against a rebuilt 13-week and 12-month cash view before anyone is told.
Runway impactWhy I don't recommend itAssumed to extend by roughly the saved payroll.Why I recommend itModelled against actual notice periods, severance and re-hire risk.
Investor and board commsWhy I don't recommend itA number announced after the decision is made.Why I recommend itA model the board can interrogate before it is approved.
What happens afterWhy I don't recommend itThe next cost review starts from scratch.Why I recommend itThe same model gets re-run monthly, so the next call is faster.

The model underneath a cost-out is the same one I set out in how to actually manage cash flow.

A restructure is also when key person riskgets tested, because the finance seat is often the one absorbing the extra load.

Common questions

Is restructuring the same as insolvency?

No. An operational cost-out and a financial restructure (renegotiating debt or investor terms) are finance-led decisions a business can run itself. Formal restructuring, administration or a deed of company arrangement, is a licensed registered liquidator's process under the Corporations Act, and that is not something a recruiter advises on.

Does Story Recruitment help with insolvency or turnaround work?

No. My practice is the first finance hire and the first CFO at Australian VC-backed startups and scale-ups. Formal insolvency restructuring needs a registered practitioner, and a genuine turnaround CFO search is a different, specialised market outside that lane.

Why does a cost-out change the finance hiring market?

What I see from the hiring side: businesses cutting costs often replace a senior finance leader with a mid-level or lower hire to save on payroll, which leaves genuinely senior candidates in the market for longer than usual. For a founder hiring right now, that means better calibre is available at roles that would not normally attract it.

Who should own a cost-out inside the business?

The finance seat, not the founder alone. A cost-out run against a rebuilt runway model, tested before headcount decisions are made, holds up to board and investor scrutiny in a way a target-driven cut does not.

References

  1. What I'm seeing in the market right now: businesses cutting costs are frequently replacing senior finance leaders with mid-level or lower hires, which is leaving genuinely senior candidates available for longer than usual.

These guides set out how we see it, drawn from the searches we run and the finance leaders we place. They are general information about the market, not financial, accounting or legal advice, and they are no substitute for advice on your own circumstances.

Resetting the cost base and need the finance seat right?

Tell us where the business is at. We will give you an honest read on the finance hire who can own the model, before you commit to a search.