Skip to content
Story Recruitment
HomeGuidesCFO PlaybookRevenue drivers
For finance leaders

What are revenue drivers, and who should own them

A revenue driver is an input that moves revenue when you move it: price, volume, conversion, retention, and the handful of others specific to your model. A metric describes what happened. A driver is something a team can go and change on Monday. Most companies track plenty of the first and can name very few of the second.

By Last updated 6 min read

Revenue drivers are the inputs that change a company's revenue when they change: typically price, volume, conversion rate and retention. They differ from general metrics because a team can act on them directly.

What a revenue driver is, and what it is not

A revenue driver is a variable that revenue is arithmetically built from. Change it and the top line moves. Revenue itself is not a driver, and neither is gross profit, because you cannot instruct anyone to go and increase them directly. Revenue as it lands in the accounts is governed by the AASB accounting standards. The drivers underneath it are not defined by any standard at all.

The test is whether you can write revenue as a product of the things you are calling drivers. If customers multiplied by average order value multiplied by orders per year reconstructs your revenue, those three are your drivers and everything else on the dashboard is commentary. Most businesses have three to five that matter, and the rest are diagnostics that explain movement in one of the five.

Revenue drivers by business model

The drivers are dictated by how the business earns, not by the industry it sits in. A subscription business and an ecommerce business can have identical revenue and share almost no drivers.

Typical revenue drivers by business model.
The usual driversWhere the movement actually comes from
SaaS and subscription

New customers, average revenue per account, expansion rate, churn or retention, contract length.

Retention and expansion, because they compound. Winning the same customer twice costs nothing.

Ecommerce

Traffic, conversion rate, average order value, purchase frequency, return rate.

Conversion and average order value, which move without paying for more traffic.

Services and consulting

Billable headcount, utilisation, average rate, project length, win rate.

Utilisation and rate. Headcount buys revenue, but it buys cost at the same time.

Marketplace

Supply, demand, transactions per user, take rate, average transaction value.

Whichever side is currently scarce. It changes, and a model that assumes it does not will mislead.

Retention is a driver on almost every subscription model. Here is what churn means and how it is calculated.

How to find your own

Start from the revenue line and work backwards until you reach numbers somebody in the business is accountable for. Wherever the arithmetic stops reconciling is where the surprises will come from.

The obstacle is usually data rather than analysis. Non-standardised data and processes are not merely a data issue, they are a fundamental business issue.[1] If sales, billing and finance each define a customer differently, no driver model built on top of them will hold, and the work is to settle the definitions before building anything.

Automation helps with the assembly, not the judgement. AI can handle 80 to 90 percent of basic finance tasks like checking, reconciliation, analysis, forecasting or modelling, but the last 10 percent requires a qualified human who understands what the challenge is and what good looks like for the outcome.[2] Deciding which five inputs actually drive your business is squarely in that last 10 percent.

Building a driver model, in numbers
3 to 5drivers that genuinely matter in most businesses. The rest are diagnostics
80 to 90%of basic finance work AI already handles: checking, reconciliation, forecasting, modelling
10%the last slice, which needs a qualified human. Choosing the drivers sits here
Assembling the model is largely automatable. Deciding which three to five inputs actually move your revenue is not.

Who should own the driver model

A driver model is only useful if one person is accountable for it, and in most growing companies that person does not exist yet. No auditor checks these numbers either. ASIC's guidance on disclosing financial information that sits outside the accounting standards is written for directors and preparers, and it sets an expectation of clarity rather than a definition of the number. The symptoms are recognisable after a raise: the forecast is not detailed enough for the new board, the reporting rhythm is still calibrated to a business half the current size, an ambitious hiring plan has not been properly costed, and cash discussions are at the same level they were twelve months ago.[3] Every one of those is a driver model that has not been rebuilt for the business the company has become.

The person who fixes it is a commercial hire, not a reporting one. For the next phase of a business a CFO needs to be a really strong commercial leader, not just from a technical skill set, but with the personality and drive to build commercial acumen across the whole business.[4] Driver ownership is exactly that job: it requires arguing with sales about conversion assumptions and with product about pricing, which is a temperament as much as a skill.

It also shows up in how good candidates describe themselves. When I look at a finance leader's profile, a specific skill like pricing and unit economics tells me far more than a generic term such as strategic leadership.[5] Someone who has genuinely owned a driver model tends to name the drivers.

The same failure shows up in the model itself. Here is what founders get wrong in their financial models.

Common questions

What are revenue drivers?

Revenue drivers are the inputs a company's revenue is arithmetically built from, such as price, volume, conversion rate and retention. What defines one is ownership: you can hand a driver to a named person and hold them to it. Revenue and gross profit both fail that test, which is why a target on either produces meetings rather than movement, and why most businesses can list twenty metrics but only three or four genuine drivers.

What is the difference between a revenue driver and a metric?

One you can act on, one you can only report. Monthly revenue is a metric; the conversion rate that produced it is a driver. Most dashboards are heavy on the first and light on the second, which is why they generate discussion without generating decisions. The working rule is that if you cannot hand the number to an owner with a lever attached, it is a metric no matter what the dashboard calls it.

How do I identify my business's revenue drivers?

Work backwards from the revenue line until you reach numbers somebody in the business is accountable for, then multiply them together and see whether they reproduce actual revenue. Expect three to five that genuinely matter; a list of twelve means you have collected diagnostics rather than drivers. Settle the definitions before the arithmetic, because if sales, billing and finance each count a customer differently the model will reconcile on paper and fall apart the first time two teams argue about the same week.

Who should own the revenue driver model in a startup?

One person, and it should be a commercial finance hire rather than a reporting one. The job is mostly disagreement. A driver model only stays honest if somebody is willing to tell sales that its conversion assumption is optimistic and product that its pricing does not survive the arithmetic. That is a temperament question, and it is the thing to interview for, because the modelling itself can be taught in a fortnight and the willingness to have the argument cannot.

References

  1. Where I land on this: the challenge of non-standardised data and processes is not merely a data issue but a fundamental business issue.
  2. My read on where automation lands: AI can handle 80-90 percent of basic finance tasks like checking, reconciliation, analysis, forecasting or modelling, but the last 10 percent requires a qualified human who understands what the challenge is and what good looks like for the outcome.
  3. What I say when this comes up: the forecast is not detailed enough for the new board, the reporting rhythm is still calibrated to a business half its current size, an ambitious hiring plan has not been properly costed, and cash discussions remain at the same level as twelve months prior.
  4. How I think about it: for the next phase of a business, a CFO needs to be a really strong commercial leader, not just from a technical skill set commerciality, but with the personality and drive to build commercial acumen across the whole business.
  5. What I tell candidates: finance leaders to list three to five specific key skills, such as pricing and unit economics, rather than generic terms like strategic leadership.

Does anyone own your driver model?

Tell us your stage, your revenue model and what the board is asking for. We will give you an honest read on the level of finance hire that can actually own it.